Why using Steven Smith as an opener in Tests would be a bad idea? Following the conclusion of the home series against Pakistan, Australia must face some difficult decisions.
The seasoned opener’s retirement leaves a significant vacuum at the top of the order. And the multitude of choices available to Australia makes it a difficult decision.
Normally, the first batter from the Sheffield Shield would be brought in and let to settle in. Former Australia all-rounder Shane Watson, on the other side, has added to the intrigue by suggesting Steve Smith for the position.
Why using Steven Smith as an opener in Tests would be a bad idea?
On that subject, here are three reasons why starting Steve Smith in Tests would be a bad idea.
1. As previously said, bringing in a starting batter from the domestic circuit who has consistently performed well is the natural course of action. Choosing Smith to begin the innings despite the aforementioned names waiting in the wings seems a bit unfair, given that they are also capable of long-term success at the top.
2. After Smith goes to the highest position of the order, Cameron Green is likely to enter the starting lineup. While this adds depth, it makes the intermediate order less secure. Travis Head, Cameron Green, Mitchell Marsh, and Alex Carey have all done well in their roles since No. 5, so reordering them seems unnecessary.
3. Every option has advantages and disadvantages, and in this situation, it is apparent that Steve Smith beginning the innings has advantages. With an experienced and technically sound hitter at the top of the order, the opponent’s advantage with the new ball is negated.
However, the combination of disadvantages it carries with it – delaying the transfer and upsetting the established batting order. Makes it an alternative that is not worth pursuing.
Read Also:- Former South African bowler sang the Bollywood song ‘Kabhi Kabhi Mere Dil Mein’